The Mannich Reaction (Carl Ulrich Franz Mannich, 1877-1947) is yet another one of those reactions that look brilliant on paper. However, I have on many occasions heard chemists attempting the reaction moan a fair bit to say the least. The major problem seems to be that the reaction is sluggish requiring heating/reflux to get anywhere and that the reagents (and desired product) start polymerising. You can find Mannich's original paper here: Mannich, C.; Krosche, W. Arch. Pharm. 1912, 250, p. 647. There is a detailed entry in Wikipedia on the reaction for those not familiar with it. A good alternative to the classic Mannich conditions is to use Eschenmoser's salt which I've seen used successfully in a number of total syntheses. Anyway, recently a PhD student in my lab was bitching about his Mannich Reaction. He left the lab, did some reading and came back with this nice JOC Note by A. Erkkila and P. M. Pihko, DOI: 10.1021/jo052529q. When he started using this stuff all his problems were solved. Fortunately, he sorted all this out right before I had to do my first Mannich Reaction. It also worked as a charm for me so I warmly recommend this simple, and efficient Mannich protocol.
Now Erkkila and Pihko are quite concerned about reaction times because they are thinking of industry applications. However, for the average chemist that does a lot of work overnight (whilst at home in bed) it isn't essential that it's done in 1 hour. We found that if you do these reactions overnight no heating is required and the products are of very high purity. Very clean reactions indeed. Here's four examples from the paper:
As it turns out the chemistry works really well for most systems using catalyst 1. However, some aldehydes require catalyst 2 to give a good result, eg. entries 3 and 4. The only compounds tested in this paper that failed completely were aldehydes that exist predominantly in a hemiacetal form, eg. 5-hydroxy-valeraldehyde. So there you have it. Maybe something you should consider giving a go next time it's alpha-methylenation time. D!

No my fingers weren't really blue. I have no idea why it keeps uploading the picture like this but it looks kind off cool and scientific. Anyway, it really wasn't particularly dramatic and if it wasn't for the glass I would never have gone to the Emergency Room. I have always heard that impaling yourself with an 


Nice stuff innit and it gets better.
You'll notice that neither Europe nor North America has any monkeys. Where I used to work we saw many similarities between PhD students and monkeys (except monkeys have better lives). However, this is clearly not reflected on this map. Anyway, serious stuff tomorrow. D!
Fortunately, all the ingredients are reasonably affordable. Mixing it all up and adding the alcohol gives a biphasic reaction mixture that looks a bit like Schweppes Orange:
However, unlike Delfourne et al. my final product wasn't clean after a simple work up. Succinimide was simply precipitating everywhere and hence some silica was required. In the end a filtration through a silica plug proved sufficient to give clean product on a reasonably large scale (18 grams) in excellent yield (97%). So despite the fact that a simple work up wasn't sufficient to clean the product up this is an easy to do reaction that I would recommend to anyone who's tired of stinky old Swern. D!
Now the above reaction is obviously totally irresponsible and was only on for less than a minute so that I could take the picture. We are dealing with a fancy piece of glassware that has oxygen bubbling through it whilst two flood lamps are hammering photons away generating singlet oxygen and in the process heating the fume hood up big time. Hence, aluminium foil on the bottom of the hood is required to
Well at least I know it's beautiful behind all that plastic and aluminium foil. This particular day I was doing the following photolysis:
We tend to use the bis-



orcid.org/0000-0003-3926-7047